1. Digital Commons@Georgia Southern
FAQ
The institutional repository at Georgia Southern University houses articles, presentations, video recordings, university publications, and creative works of faculty and students.
2. Georgia Southern Commons - Library Guides
Georgia Southern Commons collects, archives, and disseminates the intellectual and creative output of the University's faculty, staff, students, ...
Library Guides: Georgia Southern Commons: Overview
3. Campus Documents & Publications - Institutional Repository Services
Digital Commons@Georgia Southern is proud to host a vast collection of University documents and publications from every corner of campus.
Library Guides: Georgia Southern Commons: Campus Publications
4. Digital Commons – Three Million Downloads and Counting!
Aug 13, 2019 · Digital Commons@Georgia Southern reached three million downloads this summer! Sponsored and hosted by the Georgia Southern University ...
Your support ID is e4c09e46-b65d-4e7d-93e0-09fb392e74f0
5. Georgia Southern Commons - University Libraries - FAQs
Georgia Southern Commons collects, archives, and disseminates the intellectual and creative output of the University's faculty, staff, students, ...
See AlsoThe Pros and Cons of ETFsGeorgia Southern Commons collects, archives, and disseminates the intellectual and creative output of the University’s faculty, staff, students, and community partners. Georgia Southern Commons hosts contributions from across the campus and the community, including campus documents and publications, faculty and student research, conferences, journals, research data, news, and more. For more information about Georgia Southern Commons, see here.
6. Digital Commons@Georgia Southern
May 17, 2014 · Digital Commons@Georgia Southern is an open access digital collection whose purpose is to collect and disseminate the intellectual and creative ...
Digital Commons@Georgia Southern is an open access digital collection whose purpose is to collect and disseminate the intellectual and creative output of the University’s faculty, staff and students. Contributions come from all over campus and include theses/dissertations, conference proceedings, research publications, brochures, and newsletters.Besides housing our University’s scholarship and creative works, Digital Commons also has the capacity to publish online journals and manage conferences. The site also hosts SelectedWorks web pages for our faculty, which are profiles that highlight faculty publications and achievements. All these features of the repository help to expand the visibility and influence of Georgia Southern University to outside academic communities by making publications available on the open web.
7. Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Digital Commons@Georgia Southern
Qualitative data reinforce the notion that active learning is associated with conceptual change and suggests that more research is needed to examine the ...
Qualitative data reinforce the notion that active learning is associated with conceptual change and suggests that more research is needed to examine the differential effects of varying active-learning strategies on students’ attitudes and motivation in the domain. In response to calls for reform in undergraduate biology education, we conducted research examining how varying active-learning strategies impacted students’ conceptual understanding, attitudes, and motivation in two sections of a large-lecture introductory cell and molecular biology course. Using a quasi-experimental design, we collected quantitative data to compare participants’ conceptual understanding, attitudes, and motivation in the biological sciences across two contexts that employed different active-learning strategies and that were facilitated by unique instructors. Students participated in either graphic organizer/worksheet activities or clicker-based case studies. After controlling for demographic and presemester affective differences, we found that students in both active-learning environments displayed similar and significant learning gains. In terms of attitudinal and motivational data, significant differences were observed for two attitudinal measures. Specifically, those students who had participated in graphic organizer/worksheet activities demonstrated more expert-like attitudes related to their enjoyment of biology and ability to make real-world connections. However, all motivational and most att...
8. Georgia Southern's student newspaper now available on Digital ...
Oct 16, 2017 · The George-Anne, Georgia Southern's student-run newspaper, is now digitally preserved and available on Digital Commons@Georgia Southern, ...
Your support ID is a36c533b-539c-46d0-b15e-86fb69b4ea8e
9. Digital Commons@Georgia Southern Digital Commons@Georgia Southern
The non-intuitive discovery that when measuring the goodness of an exploration strategy by the stochastic shortest path to a goal state, there is a class of ...
The non-intuitive discovery that when measuring the goodness of an exploration strategy by the stochastic shortest path to a goal state, there is a class of processes for which an action selection strategy based on without-replacement sampling of actions can be worse than with-replacement sampling is detailed. : In many statistical and machine learning applications, without-replacement sampling is considered superior to with-replacement sampling. In some cases, this has been proven, and in others the heuristic is so intuitively attractive that it is taken for granted. In reinforcement learning, many count-based exploration strategies are justified by reliance on the aforementioned heuristic. This paper will detail the non-intuitive discovery that when measuring the goodness of an exploration strategy by the stochastic shortest path to a goal state, there is a class of processes for which an action selection strategy based on without-replacement sampling of actions can be worse than with-replacement sampling. Specifically, the expected time until a specified goal state is first reached can be provably larger under without-replacement sampling. Numerical experiments describe the frequency and severity of this inferiority.
